Superficial oesophageal mucosal innervation may contribute to severity of symptoms in oesophageal motility disorders.

BACKGROUND: Mechanisms underlying perception of dysphagia and chest pain have not been completely elucidated, although oesophageal mucosal afferent nerves might play an important role. AIMS: To evaluate the relationship between oesophageal mucosal afferent nerves and the severity of dysphagia and chest pain in oesophageal motility disorders. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients with oesophageal motility disorders having dysphagia and/or chest pain from whom oesophageal biopsies were obtained. High-resolution manometry classified patients into disorders of oesophagogastric junction (OGJ) outflow and disorders of peristalsis. Symptom severity was assessed using validated questionnaires including Brief Oesophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ). Immunohistochemistry was performed on oesophageal biopsies to evaluate the location of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)-immunoreactive mucosal afferent nerves. Findings were compared to existing data from 10 asymptomatic healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Of 79 patients, 61 patients had disorders of OGJ outflow and 18 had disorders of peristalsis. CGRP-immunoreactive mucosal nerves were more superficially located in the mucosa of patients with oesophageal motility disorders compared to healthy volunteers. Within disorders of OGJ outflow, the location of CGRP-immunoreactive nerves negatively correlated with BEDQ score both in the proximal (ρ = -0.567, p < 0.001) and distal oesophagus (ρ = -0.396, p = 0.003). In the proximal oesophagus, strong chest pain was associated with more superficially located mucosal nerves than weak chest pain (p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis showed superficial nerves in the proximal oesophagus was independently associated with severe dysphagia in disorders of OGJ outflow (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Superficial location of mucosal nerves in the proximal oesophagus might contribute to symptoms, especially severe dysphagia, in disorders of OGJ outflow.

Identification of novel immune cell signature in gastroesophageal reflux disease: altered mucosal mast cells and dendritic cell profile.

Introduction: Heartburn pathogenesis in GERD remains incompletely understood. We aimed to identify differences in the immune cell signature and sensory mucosal markers between reflux phenotypes and healthy asymptomatic subjects. Methods: Thirty-seven patients with heartburn symptoms were phenotyped endoscopically and with objective reflux studies into erosive reflux disease (ERD) (N=10), nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) (N=9), functional heartburn (FH) (N=9), and Barrett's esophagus (BO) (N=9). Bulk mRNA-sequencing(RNA-seq) was conducted on RNA extracted from endoscopic biopsies, and immune cell deconvolution analysis was performed using CIBERSORT. RNA-seq findings were validated by immunofluorescent staining for CD1a, nerve growth factor (NGF), and mast cell tryptase in corresponding patient biopsies. Results: Transcriptomic analysis detected higher mast cell abundance in BO, ERD, and NERD compared to healthy controls (p<0.05), with decreased dendritic cell infiltration in BO, ERD, and NERD patients compared to healthy controls and FH patients. CD1a-positive dendritic cell infiltration was significantly higher in the healthy esophageal mucosa at protein level compared to BO (p=0.0005), ERD (p=0.0004), and FH patients (p=0.0096). Moreover, NGF co-expression on mast cells in GERD patients was significantly higher than in healthy controls (p=0.0094). Discussion: The mucosa in patients with GERD had a significant increase in NGF expression on mast cells, suggesting an upregulation of signalling for neuronal sprouting in GERD. Moreover, decreased dendritic cell abundance in GERD esophageal mucosa may play a role in reduced oral tolerance and development of subsequent immune responses which may participate in esophageal sensitivity.

Sensory Phenotype of the Oesophageal Mucosa in Gastro-Oesophageal Reflux Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) affects up to 20% of Western populations, yet sensory mechanisms underlying heartburn pathogenesis remain incompletely understood. While central mechanisms of heartburn perception have been established in earlier studies, recent studies have highlighted an important role of neurochemical, inflammatory, and cellular changes occurring in the oesophageal mucosa itself. The localization and neurochemical characterisation of sensory afferent nerve endings differ among GORD phenotypes, and could explain symptom heterogeneity among patients who are exposed to similar levels of reflux. Acid-induced stimulation of nociceptors on pain-sensing nerve endings can regulate afferent signal transmission. This review considers the role of peripheral mechanisms of sensitization in the amplification of oesophageal sensitivity in patients with GORD.

Esophageal mucosal sensory nerves and potential mechanoreceptors in patients with ineffective esophageal motility.

BACKGROUND: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is the most common motility disorder. However, little is known about its pathophysiology. Vagal afferent nerves convey esophageal intraluminal bolus information to solitary nucleus, which is likely to be involved with esophageal primary and secondary peristalsis (SP). We hypothesized that altered mucosal sensory afferents underlie the pathogenesis of IEM. METHODS: We prospectively collected esophageal biopsies from 38 patients with proton pump inhibitor-refractory reflux symptoms from January to December 2019. All patients underwent high-resolution manometry for the evaluation of primary and secondary peristalsis, and off-PPI 24-h impedance-pH studies. Biopsies were analyzed using immunohistochemistry for identification of calcitonin gene-related peptide-immunoreactive (CGRP-IR) nerves and qPCR for mRNA expression of potential mechanoreceptors. KEY RESULTS: Overall 32 patients were finally analyzed which consisted of 11 patients with normal motility and 21 patients with IEM. The position of mucosal CGRP-IR nerves from the esophageal lumen did not differ between the two groups (the proximal esophagus (p = 0.52), the mid-esophagus (p = 0.92), the distal esophagus (p = 0.29)) with the similar reflux profile. No difference was seen in the position of CGRP-IR nerves between patients with successful triggering of SP and those unable to trigger SP. There was also no difference in mRNA expression of each potential mechanoreceptors (TRPA1, TRPV1, TRPV4, ASIC1, ASIC3) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Our study showed that mucosal sensory afferents nerve position and mRNA expression of potential mechanoreceptors did not correlate to weak esophageal contraction.

Esophageal afferent innervation and its role in gastro-esophageal reflux disease symptoms.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite the wide prevalence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying heartburn perception in the esophagus of patients with GERD remains incompletely understood. Recent studies have highlighted the potential influence sensory afferent nerves innervating the oesophageal epithelium may have on heartburn pathogenesis. The purpose of this review is to consider the current understanding of esophageal afferent neuronal innervation, including the nociceptive role of acid-sensing receptors expressed on these sensory nerves, in relation to pain perception in the esophagus of GERD patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Central and peripheral pathways of sensitization following noxious stimulation of nociceptive receptors expressed on afferent nerves can regulate the strength of sensory nerve activation in the esophagus, which can result in the amplification or suppression of afferent signal transmission. The localization and characterization of mucosal sensory afferent nerves vary between GERD phenotypes and may explain the heterogeneity of symptom perception in patients with apparently similar levels of reflux. SUMMARY: In this review, we discuss the relevance of afferent esophageal innervation in heartburn perception, with a particular focus on the pathways of reflux-induced activation of nociceptive nerves.

Esophageal Mucosa Innervation in Children With Nonerosive Reflux Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Esophageal mucosa innervation in adults with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) is more superficial compared with healthy volunteers. We delineated the esophageal mucosal innervation in pediatric NERD and controls. METHODS: Distal and proximal pediatric esophageal biopsies were immunohistochemically stained with calcitonin gene-related peptide and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1. RESULTS: Mucosal innervation was assessed in 18 controls (9M:9F, median age: 9 years) and 11 NERD patients (6M:5F, median age: 5 years). Calcitonin gene-related peptide positive nerve fibers were lying deep in the mucosa in both groups, P > 0.05 and did not coexpress transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily V member 1. DISCUSSION: The pediatric esophageal mucosa in NERD displays deep lying nerve fibers, in contrast to adults.

Heartburn sensation in nonerosive reflux disease: pattern of superficial sensory nerves expressing TRPV1 and epithelial cells expressing ASIC3 receptors.

The underlying causes of heartburn, characteristic symptom of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), remain incompletely understood. Superficial afferent innervation of the esophageal mucosa in nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) may drive nociceptive reflux perception, but its acid-sensing role has not yet been established. Transient receptor potential vanilloid subfamily member-1 (TRPV1), transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8), and acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) are regulators of sensory nerve activity and could be important reflux-sensing receptors within the esophageal mucosa. We characterized TRPV1, TRPM8, and ASIC3 expression in esophageal mucosa of patients with GERD. We studied 10 patients with NERD, 10 with erosive reflux disease (ERD), 7 with functional heartburn (FH), and 8 with Barrett's esophagus (BE). Biopsies obtained from the distal esophageal mucosa were costained with TRPV1, TRPM8, or ASIC3, and CGRP, CD45, or E-cadherin. RNA expression of TRPV1, TRPM8, and ASIC3 was assessed using qPCR. Patients with NERD had significantly increased expression of TRPV1 on superficial sensory nerves compared with ERD (P = 0.028) or BE (P = 0.017). Deep intrapapillary nerve endings did not express TRPV1 in all phenotypes studied. ASIC3 was exclusively expressed on epithelial cells most significantly in patients with NERD and ERD (P ≤0.0001). TRPM8 was expressed on submucosal CD45+ leukocytes. Superficial localization of TRPV1-immunoreactive nerves in NERD, and increased ASIC3 coexpression on epithelial cells in NERD and ERD, suggests a mechanism for heartburn sensation. Esophageal epithelial cells may play a sensory role in acid reflux perception and act interdependently with TRPV1-expressing mucosal nerves to augment hypersensitivity in patients with NERD, raising the enticing possibility of topical antagonists for these ion channels as a therapeutic option.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We demonstrate for the first time that increased pain perception in patients with nonerosive reflux disease likely results from expression of acid-sensitive channels on superficial mucosal afferents and esophageal epithelial cells, raising the potential for topical therapy.

Mucosal pathogenesis in gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: Despite gastro-esophageal reflux disease affecting up to 20% of Western populations, relatively little is known about the molecular mechanisms underlying its most troublesome symptom: heartburn. Recent findings have unveiled the role of components of the esophageal mucosa in the pathogenesis of GERD including sensory nociceptive nerves and inflammatory mediators. Erosive esophagitis was long believed to develop as a result of acid injury at the esophageal lumen, but novel concepts suggest the generation of reflux-induced esophageal injury as a result of cytokine-mediated inflammation. Moreover, the localization and characterization of mucosal afferent nerves vary between GERD phenotypes and could explain the heterogeneity of symptom perception between patients who experience similar levels of acid reflux. PURPOSE: The purpose of this review is to consider the crosstalk of different factors of the esophageal mucosa in the pathogenesis of GERD, with a particular focus on mucosal innervation and molecular basis of acid-induced cytokine response. We discuss the current understanding of the mucosal response to acid injury, the nociceptive role of acid-sensitive receptors expressed in the esophageal mucosa, and the role of esophageal epithelial cells in initiating the onset of erosive esophagitis.

Loss of MMP-8 in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)-associated myoepithelial cells contributes to tumour promotion through altered adhesive and proteolytic function.

BACKGROUND: Normal myoepithelial cells (MECs) play an important tumour-suppressor role in the breast but display an altered phenotype in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), gaining tumour-promoter functions. Matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) is expressed by normal MECs but is lost in DCIS. This study investigated the function of MMP-8 in MECs and the impact of its loss in DCIS. METHODS: Primary normal and DCIS-associated MECs, and normal (N-1089) and DCIS-modified myoepithelial (ß6-1089) cell lines, were used to assess MMP-8 expression and function. ß6-1089 lacking MMP-8 were transfected with MMP-8 WT and catalytically inactive MMP-8 EA, and MMP-8 in N-1089 MEC was knocked down with siRNA. The effect on adhesion and migration to extracellular matrix (ECM), localisation of α6ß4 integrin to hemidesmosomes (HD), TGF-ß signalling and gelatinase activity was measured. The effect of altering MEC MMP-8 expression on tumour cell invasion was investigated in 2D and 3D organotypic models. RESULTS: Assessment of primary cells and MEC lines confirmed expression of MMP-8 in normal MEC and its loss in DCIS-MEC. Over-expression of MMP-8 WT but not MMP-8 EA in ß6-1089 cells increased adhesion to ECM proteins and reduced migration. Conversely, knock-down of MMP-8 in N-1089 reduced adhesion and increased migration. Expression of MMP-8 WT in ß6-1089 led to greater localisation of α6ß4 to HD and reduced retraction fibre formation, this being reversed by MMP-8 knock-down in N-1089. Over-expression of MMP-8 WT reduced TGF-ß signalling and gelatinolytic activity. MMP-8 knock-down enhanced TGF-ß signalling and gelatinolytic activity, which was reversed by blocking MMP-9 by knock-down or an inhibitor. MMP-8 WT but not MMP-8 EA over-expression in ß6-1089 reduced breast cancer cell invasion in 2D and 3D invasion assays, while MMP-8 knock-down in N-1089 enhanced cancer cell invasion. Staining of breast cancer cases for MMP-8 revealed a statistically significant loss of MMP-8 expression in DCIS with invasion versus pure DCIS (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate MMP-8 is a vital component of the myoepithelial tumour-suppressor function. It restores MEC interaction with the matrix, opposes TGF-ß signalling and MMP-9 proteolysis, which contributes to inhibition of tumour cell invasion. Assessment of MMP-8 expression may help to determine risk of DCIS progression.